Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 985 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 96% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $69.82 vs $1595.95
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 2% better in Lost Ark than Ryzen 3 3200G - 249 vs 244 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 44 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $69.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77142 minutes ago
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
89.53191489361703%
Multi-Core
3013
31.323422393180167%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Picasso | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 22 |
4 | Threads | 44 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 145 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |