Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 75 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $83.78 vs $554.05
- Up to 84% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-9900T - $0.66 vs $4.2 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen 3 3200G - 132 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
126
95.45454545454545%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$83.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $83.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1621 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
15.714285714285714%
Price, $
$554.05
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $554.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1621 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
73.41242149337054%
Multi-Core
3013
50.26693360026694%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |