Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 113 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $69.82 vs $1499.0
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 65 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 21% better in Starfield than Ryzen 3 3200G - 64 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $69.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77118 minutes ago
Buy for $1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
59.10112359550562%
Multi-Core
3013
35.051186598417864%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 127 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |