Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 75 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $85.15 vs $667.41
- Up to 87% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-9900 - $0.16 vs $1.24 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen 3 3200G - 540 vs 522 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
522
96.66666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $85.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
540
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
12.903225806451612%
Price, $
$667.41
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $667.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
65.30105524518932%
Multi-Core
3013
41.823986674069964%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |