Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 674 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $81.39 vs $397.83
- Up to 79% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-7940X - $0.12 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 2% better in Rocket League than Ryzen 3 3200G - 714 vs 699 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 28 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
699
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5268 minutes ago
Buy for $397.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5268 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |