Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 741 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $81.39 vs $412.83
- Up to 78% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-7900X - $0.16 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 9% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 3 3200G - 560 vs 515 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 20 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
515
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5317 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
560
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
21%
Price, $
$412.83
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $412.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5317 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |