Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 1277 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-13700 - $85.15 vs $319.99
- Up to 67% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-13700 - $0.51 vs $1.55 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 24% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 3200G - 206 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 24 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
166
80.58252427184466%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $85.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
32.903225806451616%
Price, $
$319.99
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $319.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
39.96960486322189%
Multi-Core
3013
20.41466223998916%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |