Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 278 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $81.39 vs $1150.0
- Up to 93% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.62 vs $8.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 3 3200G - 134 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 48 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
132
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.58/FPS
7%
Price, $
$1150
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |