Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2740 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 5% better in The Outer Worlds than FX-8320 - 205 vs 195 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 68% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - $64.3 vs $199.9
- Up to 66% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Ryzen 3 3100 - $0.33 vs $0.98 per FPS
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $199.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Buy for $64.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |