Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2300X outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2300X is 615 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
- Performs up to 77% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G3930T - 46 vs 26 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2300X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 2300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76511 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
45.477178423236516%
Multi-Core
948
28.692493946731233%
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |