Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Ryzen 3 2300U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 1218 days older than Ryzen 3 2300U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 0% better in Dishonored 2 than Ryzen 3 2300U - 260 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2300U - 20 vs 4 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 3 2300U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2018
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
