Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 567 days older than Ryzen 3 2200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 6% better in Far Cry 5 than Ryzen 3 2200U - 203 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200U - 12 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1416
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,416 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |