Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 2507 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1280 - 179 vs 172 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1280 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |