Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $130.0 vs $260.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-9700F - $0.83 vs $1.38 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 20% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 3 2200G - 188 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 8 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
157
83.51063829787235%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5320 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.38/FPS
60.14492753623188%
Price, $
$260
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5321 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
997
64.36410587475791%
Multi-Core
2858
45.68414322250639%
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |