Buy on Amazon
$130
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $99
Availability
MSRP in USD: $99
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - $130.0 vs $250.26
- Up to 46% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-9700 - $0.98 vs $1.83 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 3 2200G - 137 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 8 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
132
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Processor with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics - YD2200C5FBBOX
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8152 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-9700 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.7 GHz LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for $250.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Core i7-9700
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
