Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1328 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $65.23 vs $85.13
- Up to 19% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-10105F - $0.39 vs $0.48 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 1300X - 176 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
167
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16082 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
81%
Price, $
$85.13
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16081 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |