Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 266 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $65.23 vs $84.38
- Up to 21% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 5 2600X - $0.26 vs $0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 3 1300X - 255 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 12 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
254
99.6078431372549%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4917 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
255
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
78.78787878787878%
Price, $
$84.38
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for $84.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4918 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Single-Core
1097
88.68229587712207%
Multi-Core
3157
59.98479954398632%
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |