Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1053 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 1% better in The Outer Worlds than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 200 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$369
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $369 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58293 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
926
94.10569105691057%
Multi-Core
3996
100%
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Haswell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |