Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1328 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 3 1200 - 175 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $85.13 vs $395.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 3 1200 - $0.49 vs $2.31 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3858 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3856 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |