Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670S outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670S is 1893 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-4670S - $19.95 vs $43.88
- Up to 41% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-4670S - $0.16 vs $0.27 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 36% better in War Thunder than Phenom X4 9650 - 165 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
121
73.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
59.25925925925925%
Price, $
$43.88
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $43.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
20.677671589921808%
Multi-Core
765
23.509526736324524%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |