Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 4044 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $39.99 vs $80.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i3-9100F - $0.68 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 69% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Phenom X4 9650 - 100 vs 59 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
59
59%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1615 minutes ago
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1623 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
17.321688500727802%
Multi-Core
765
20.850367947669664%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i3 |
Agena | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |