Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 4737 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 16% better in F1 22 than Phenom X4 9550 - 285 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $140.0 vs $189.95
- Up to 37% better value when playing F1 22 than Phenom X4 9550 - $0.49 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 12 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
285
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |