Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 2968 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 27% better in Dota 2 than Phenom II X4 925 - 204 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$379
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
22.678951098511693%
Multi-Core
930
11.848643139253408%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Deneb | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |