Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 1939 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Phenom II X4 925 - 102 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 12 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
102
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1586 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
27.586206896551722%
Multi-Core
930
17.086165717435236%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Deneb | Codename | Haswell E |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |