Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 4327 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 28% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom II X4 925 - 145 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1822 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
15.080113100848255%
Multi-Core
930
11.358085002442598%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Deneb | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |