Key Differences
In short — Celeron G540 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G540 is 846 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than Phenom II X4 925 - 228 vs 227 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
Deneb | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |