Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 1816 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 3% better in Remnant II than Phenom II X4 925 - 79 vs 77 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 53 vs 95 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Deneb | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
