Key Differences
In short — FX-4100 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4100 is 884 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Performs up to 27% better in League of Legends than Phenom II X4 925 - 52 vs 41 FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
78.239608801956%
Multi-Core
930
90.46692607003891%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | FX |
| Deneb | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
