Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2835 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 17% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-9590 - 377 vs 321 FPS
- Up to 40% cheaper than FX-9590 - $179.99 vs $298.02
- Up to 48% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than FX-9590 - $0.48 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 125 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6575 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
377
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6576 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |