Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1773 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 33% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-9590 - 329 vs 247 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than FX-9590 - $140.0 vs $298.02
- Up to 64% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than FX-9590 - $0.43 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 12 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
329
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |