Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 2321 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10940X - $193.93 vs $699.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-10940X - $1.52 vs $5.1 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-9370 - 137 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 165 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 28 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
128
93.43065693430657%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$193.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $193.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.1/FPS
29.803921568627455%
Price, $
$699
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i9-10940X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Vishera | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |