Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2603 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $193.93 vs $279.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Control than Core i9-10850K - $0.97 vs $1.37 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than FX-9370 - 203 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 125 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $193.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |