Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 3863 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $193.93 vs $369.57
- Up to 28% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-14700F - $1.67 vs $2.32 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 37% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-9370 - 159 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 28 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $193.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3767 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.32/FPS
71%
Price, $
$369.57
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $369.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3767 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
220 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |