Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9600K outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9600K is 1956 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-9370 - 138 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than FX-9370 - $155.0 vs $193.93
- Up to 26% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than FX-9370 - $1.12 vs $1.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 95 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $193.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$155
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |