Buy on Amazon
$193.93
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4590 outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4590 is 324 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Performs up to 32% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than FX-9370 - 91 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 59% cheaper than FX-9370 - $79.0 vs $193.93
- Up to 69% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than FX-9370 - $0.87 vs $2.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 84 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
AMD FD9370FHHKWOF FX-9370 FX-Series 8-Core Black Edition
Buy for $193.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4221 minutes ago
Core i5-4590
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
91
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-4590 BX80646I54590 Processor (6M Cache, 3.3 GHz)
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-9370
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Core i5-4590
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i5-4590 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 220 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
