Key Differences
In short — FX-9370 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-9370 is 884 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Core i5-2400S - 177 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 62% cheaper than FX-9370 - $70.0 vs $183.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Stray than FX-9370 - $0.4 vs $1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $183 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |