Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2217 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than FX-9370 - 268 vs 253 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than FX-9370 - $81.39 vs $193.93
- Up to 61% better value when playing F1 22 than FX-9370 - $0.3 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $193.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
268
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |