Buy on Amazon
$276.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $194
Availability
MSRP in USD: $194
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3550 outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3550 is 856 days older than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i5-3550 - $276.99 vs $335.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-3550 - $1.23 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550
- Performs up to 1% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-8370 - 228 vs 225 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
AMD FD8370FRHKBOX FX-8370 Black Edition 8 Core CPU Processor AM3+ 4300Mhz 125W 16MB
Buy for $276.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
Intel BX80637I53550 Core i5-3550 3.3GHz Quad-Core Desktop Processor
Buy for $335 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i5-3550
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i5-3550 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
