Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1336 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than FX-8350 - 198 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than FX-8350 - $78.02 vs $185.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Valheim than FX-8350 - $0.39 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4888 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4889 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |