Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2268 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $185.0 vs $295.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-9900KF - $1.28 vs $1.92 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than FX-8350 - 154 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18770 minutes ago
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18770 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |