Buy on Amazon
$182.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2552 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $182.02 vs $565.0
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 6% better in Forza Horizon 5 than FX-8350 - 173 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 20 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
AMD FX-Series FX-8350 FX8350 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD8350FRW8KHK FD8350FRHKBOX 4GHz 8MB 8 cores
Buy for $182.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-10900X Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 4.7GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W (BX8069510900X)
Buy for $565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 311 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Vishera | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using FX-8350 or Core i9-10900X
Forza Horizon 5, 1920 x 1080, Max
173 FPS
$35.26/FPS
GeForce RTX 4090
Core i9-10900X
16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 5 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$6,099.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
