Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $185.0 vs $275.98
- Up to 14% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i9-10900 - $1.1 vs $1.28 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 29% better in Dota 2 than FX-8350 - 216 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17836 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
216
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
85%
Price, $
$275.98
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17837 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |