Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-4930K outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-4930K is 313 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 125 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than FX-8350 - 380 vs 372 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than FX-8350 - $89.95 vs $185.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Battlefield IV than FX-8350 - $0.24 vs $0.5 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15163 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
380
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |