Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700 is 3381 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-12700 - $182.02 vs $265.48
- Up to 23% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-12700 - $1.43 vs $1.86 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 13% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8350 - 143 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $182.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
143
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
76%
Price, $
$265.48
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |