Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8600K outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8600K is 1808 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8350 - 178 vs 152 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than FX-8350 - $148.49 vs $185.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8350 - $0.83 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6811 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$148.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $148.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6812 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |