Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 4011 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - $182.02 vs $235.6
- Up to 10% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-14600K - $0.27 vs $0.3 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 18% better in Rocket League than FX-8350 - 798 vs 674 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
674
84.46115288220551%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$182.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $182.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
798
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
90.00000000000001%
Price, $
$235.6
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |