Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600 is 3381 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 31% better in Valorant than FX-8350 - 897 vs 687 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than FX-8350 - $165.48 vs $182.02
- Up to 31% better value when playing Valorant than FX-8350 - $0.18 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
687
76.58862876254182%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
69.23076923076923%
Price, $
$182.02
90%
Buy for $182.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
897
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$165.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $165.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |