Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3066 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8350 - 188 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than FX-8350 - $85.13 vs $185.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8350 - $0.45 vs $1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3387 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3387 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |