Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2935 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 29% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - $185.0 vs $261.99
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 49% better in Rust than FX-8350 - 231 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Rust than FX-8350 - $1.13 vs $1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3996 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$261.99
70%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $261.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3996 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |