Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v2 is 357 days older than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Performs up to 5% better in Grand Theft Auto V than FX-8320E - 111 vs 106 FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |